//

AN ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ FEEDBACK ON PEER CORRECTION ACTIVITY IN WRITING CLASS

BACA FULL TEXT ABSTRAK Pemesanan Versi cetak
Pengarang Rita Tauhidah - Personal Name
SubjectWRITING SYSTEMS (LINGUISTICS)
Bahasa English
Fakultas Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan
Tahun Terbit 2014

Abstrak/Catatan

Keywords: Feedback, Peer Correction, Writing The objective of this study was to analyze the kinds of feedback made by students of the Study Program of English Education at Syiah Kuala University Banda Aceh in Writing class. The main purpose of the study was to find out the kinds of students’ written feedback in the scope of direct feedback: sharing knowledge and negotiation (Brown, 2001), support (Williams & Jacobs, 2004), consultation (Hedge, 2000) and appreciation (Yau, et al., 2003, cited in Silvianti and Yusuf, 2014, p. 37) and indirect feedback: uncoded and coded feedback (Hendrickson, 1984 cited, in Rosdiana, 2013, p. 29). The subject of this study was 25 under graduate students who took the course Argumentative Class (Writing III). The data was collected through qualitative method obtained from documents in the form of students' worksheets. The data was analyzed by the coding process suggested by Hyland and Hyland (2001). The result of the study promoted two different numbers of feedback, namely direct feedback and indirect feedback. A number of 61 direct feedbacks (responding) covered in 12 sharing knowledge, 9 in negotiation, 28 in support, 7 in appreciation, and 5 in criticism. Meanwhile, 142 indirect feedbacks (correcting) covered 9 in coded, 26 in uncoded, 100 in the combination of coded and uncoded feedback and 7 in direct answer feedbacks. It can be concluded that the students commonly used supportive feedback to respond their friends’ writing and both coded and uncoded feedback to mark their friends’ errors.

Tempat Terbit Banda Aceh
Literature Searching Service

Hard copy atau foto copy dari buku ini dapat diberikan dengan syarat ketentuan berlaku, jika berminat, silahkan hubungi via telegram (Chat Services LSS)

Share Social Media

Tulisan yang Relevan

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL BY USING PEER FEEDBACK TECHNIQUE (AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY AT THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS’ OF MAN 3 BANDA ACEH) (Sari Afriza, 2016)

AN ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ FEEDBACK ON PEER CORRECTION ACTIVITY IN WRITING CLASS (Rita Tauhidah, 2015)

THE IMPACT OF TEACHER’S FEEDBACK ON STUDENTS’ WRITING PERFORMANCE(AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY AT SMAN 1 INGIN JAYA) (Deci Kamelya, 2014)

ORAL AND WRITTEN TEACHER FEEDBACK ON STUDENTS’ WRITING PERFORMANCE (A CASE STUDY AT THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF AR-RANIRY STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY) (Naria Fitriani, 2016)

THE TEACHER’S FEEDBACK ON STUDENTS’ WRITING PERFORMANCE (A DESCRIPTIVE QUALITATIVE RESEARCH AT SECOND GRADE STUDENTS IN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL 10 FAJAR HARAPAN BANDA ACEH) (Fitri Fonna, 2018)

  Kembali ke sebelumnya

Pencarian

Advance



Jenis Akses


Tahun Terbit

   

Program Studi

   

© UPT. Perpustakaan Universitas Syiah Kuala 2015     |     Privacy Policy