Judicial review decision number: 73 PK/PDT/2021 is a lawsuit concerning unlawful acts against the respondent for judicial review because it controls the object of dispute belonging to the petitioner for judical review. However, the panel of judges for the judicial review in their legal considerations stated that the lawsuit in the case could not be accepted because of the lack of parties (Plurium Litis Consortium), so that the lawsuit for unlawful acts could not be granted.
The purpose of this case study is to explain the legal considerations of the panel of judges in deciding the case number: 73 PK/PDT/2021 regarding the lawsuit against the law that cannot be accepted due to lack of parties. The writing of this case study also aims to explain the judicial review decision number: 73 PK/PDT/2021 in relation to the application of the principles of justice, legal certainty, and benefits for litigants.
This type of research is normative legal research. The approach used is the statute approach, the case approach, and the conceptual approach.
The results of the research on the judicial review decision number: 73 PK/PDT/2021 in legal considerations the panel of judges stated that PT. Bumicon must be withdrawn as a party to obtain clarity regarding the status of the object of dispute, but after analyzing the evidence it does not show that there is a lack of parties. The status of the object of dispute in the case clearly belongs to the petitioner for judicial review obtained from PT. Bumicon as a substitute for loan payment. This decision has also not been able to provide justice, legal certainty, and benefits for litigants.
It is recommended that the panel of judges in examining and deciding a case pay more attention and focus on the arguments of the lawsuit, the evidence of the parties, the facts of the trial, and the principles of civil procedural law. Furthermore, the principles of justice, legal certainty, and benefits must always be included in every legal considerations of the panel of judges.